The (neo)classic postulates of employment and the determination of wages in Keynes

Vol. 11 No. 4 (1991)

Oct-Dec / 1991
Published October 1, 1991
PDF-Portuguese (Português (Brasil))
PDF-Portuguese (Português (Brasil))

How to Cite

Miranda, Luiz. 1991. “The (neo)classic Postulates of Employment and the Determination of Wages in Keynes”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 11 (4):524-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571991-0908.

The (neo)classic postulates of employment and the determination of wages in Keynes

Luiz Miranda
Departamento de Ciências Econômicas da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS, Porto Alegre/RS, Brasil.
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 11 No. 4 (1991), Oct-Dec / 1991, Pages 524-544

Abstract

This article deals with Keynes’ contribution on the recovering of the income and employment levels of growth. Contrary to the (neo) classical approach, Keynes argues that unemployment and the fall of nominal wages are not necessary to economic recovering. Even with fixed nominal wages and increasing primary costs, economic growth on the short run, via effective demand expansion allows firms to maximize their profits through the reduction of the real wage caused by the increase of general price level. On Keynes’ view, the incompatibility between the sus-taining of real wage level and the short run economic recovering arises from his critical refor-mulation of the principle of decreasing returns, as stated by the (neo) classical theory of produc-tion costs and supply prices. However, still in a Keynesian perspective, this incompatibility, if taken for granted it is not a theoretical request for the analysis of economic growth on the long run.

JEL Classification: B22; B31.


Keywords: History of economic thought Keynes